Month: February 2007 Page 2 of 4

My new perspective

Okay, it isn’t really a NEW perspective. I’ve been utilizing this perspective on and off since I started grad school, but I’m now embracing it even more fully. The perspective is this: School is for learning. That’s it. Simple, right? But oh-so-helpful when most of the people around you are driven not only to learn stuff, but to produce and publish original research at an alarming rate, even as first-year students. Now, I have no problem with this; a lot of people want to do that, and they want the job that it will get them. I neither want to do it, nor do I want the job it would get me. And trying to compete with people who DO want those things stresses me out. So I’m vowing right now not to do it any more. If I start to try, stop me.

This new contentment in the face of a paper that’s due tomorrow (thirteen hours and counting) came out of a conversation with a fellow first-year grad student is also no longer sure this is what she wants–in fact, her thoughts on the subject are remarkably similar to mine, up to and including the probably intention of going into library science after the English degree. We came to grad school to learn. I certainly have no pretensions of being able to say ANYTHING new about nearly anything, especially not European Romanticism when I’ve had exactly four weeks of graduate study in Romanticism (in this class) and roughly two weeks of undergrad study on Romanticism in a survey course, and especially not when my professor is, like, incredibly knowledgable on the subject. So I’m going to learn all I can and not worry about whether or not my essays are publishable.

The last two weeks studying for this paper, I’ve read two or three full books on the sublime (my chosen topic, which is fascinating, but HUGE), plus bits and pieces of ten or twelve other books, plus Kant. KANT, people! I don’t know whether I’m overwhelmed by how much I struggled with Kant, or pleased by how much I was able to eventually comprehend. (It does get easier after reading six different commentators telling you what he’s saying.) And I have learned A TON. It’s not everything, it’s not even probably enough, and it certainly isn’t as many original sources as I’d like (except for Kant, because hey. I can now say I’ve read Kant, and that’s worth something, right? Even if it wasn’t ALL of Kant? Right? Never mind…), I still sort of feel like I’m drinking from a fire hose, and I feel like that though everything in my essay is TRUE, it may not be significant because I haven’t read everything out there on the subject. But you know what? I know a hella lot more about it than I did two weeks ago. And I’m considering that a plus.

So my new perspective is that school=learning and learning=good and whether or not the professor is totally entranced by my essay is, given my goals for this phase of my life, somewhat irrelevant. Not that I’m saying we shouldn’t do our best…just that our best can be somewhat qualified by our goals, and my best doesn’t have to look like the best of someone who’s gunning for a PhD and a tenure-track position in a few years. And I’m okay with that. And knowing that has kept me wonderfully stress-free even while reading all these books over the past few weeks, because suddenly my motivation wasn’t to quickly find all the right information to feed into my topic, but to learn as much as I could and gain as wide an understanding as I could before narrowing down my topic (which I did today). I know a lot more now than I would have if I’d done it the other way. And I’m rambling. Because being stress-free doesn’t mean I’m not tired at 2:30 in the morning.

(Rambling side-note: it’s much easier for me to be stress-free about papers when only the professor is reading them, like this one. My next paper is a seminar paper, meaning the whole class will read it before class, and I will read it in class, and we will discuss it. This scares me a whole lot more, because grad students are scarier than professors. I do not know why this is. They are not scary in one-on-one situations; they are my friends. But in class? Reading my paper? Scary. All this side-note to say that in two weeks, if I start stressing out, remind me of this post, and that I’m not competing with the other grad students, even with my seminar paper.)

Blogs and 18th Century Periodicals

Occasioned by this post over at Mumblety-Peg (especially the comment that blogging is a poor medium for expressing ideas), and encouraged by the many dozens of pages I’ve been reading in 18th-century literary and aesthetic culture (for a paper I should be writing now instead of this), a few thoughts on blogging as a continuation of 18th-century periodicals. With the caveat that I am nowhere near an expert on 18th-century periodicals.

The 18th-century really saw the beginning of what we now call magazines, in the form of journals published periodically by the members of various literary circles. The most well-remembered periodicals of the day are Joseph Addison and Richard Steele‘s The Spectator, Samuel Johnson‘s The Rambler, and Steele’s The Tatler, but there were many, many others–often by a group of friends, but sometimes by individuals. These periodicals concerned themselves with contemporary politics, culture, literature, and personalities, and took the various forms of essays, opinion pieces, reviews, satires, and personal narratives. And many of the essays were published anonymously or pseudonymously. In fact, a good bit of scholarly work in this area has been done simply trying to ascertain who wrote various anonymous reviews in these periodicals.

The periodicals at this time also introduced the now-ubiquitous “letter to the editor,” giving anyone and everyone the chance to respond to the published essays. Later issues might respond back to letters to the editor–in fact, sometimes the letters were actually written pseudonymously by the publication’s authors! In addition to this direct conversation with readers, the periodicals were in constant conversation with each other, publishing essays that responded to essays in other, often opposing periodicals. Sometimes individuals used periodicals to carry on debates in an open-letter format.

I would submit, along with many academics specializing in 18th-century literature, that blogging today is not qualitatively different than the 18th-century periodical culture. You have nearly personal publishing by individuals or small groups. You have readers with the ability to respond, either directly via comments or indirectly via trackbacks to their own blogs, and writers (usually) willing to return responses. You have interaction between different publishers/writers. You have coverage of any topic under the sun. You have the possibility for anonymity/pseudonymity. The difference between blogs and 18th-century periodicals seems to me to be almost entirely quantitative rather than qualitative–the barrier of entry is much lower, which does lower the signal to noise ratio, I’ll certainly grant you that. But though blogging’s open-access, open-ended format may encourage bad behavior and low-quality self-expression, it doesn’t necessarily mean that blogging can’t be an extremely useful tool when these very same qualities are used well.

Just think, the Joseph Addison of the 21st century could be blogging right now, and 200 years from now, academics will be placing his (or her!) blog alongside The Spectator in the periodical canon.

Note: A lot of this post (okay, most of this post) is based on a post made by the psuedonymous academic of BitchPhD; it’s basically a reprinting of a paper she presented at the MLA Conference this year, specifically about the connections between pseudonymity in the 18th-century periodicals and in blogging.

See also: John Holbo’s posting about his MLA paper from the same panel. A draft .pdf of his paper “Form Follows the Function of the Little Magazine” (an ambitious and exciting view of what academic blogging could be) is here.

Grey’s Anatomy (spoilers) & The Office (not really spoilers)

Okay, Grey’s is seriously killing me here. I may have to stop watching (after next week, of course!) so I can get them all in one dose again. ‘Cause this waiting a week between episodes? BLOWS.

What exactly is Meredith’s issue at this point in time? I mean, not the freezing in Seattle’s bay, but the reason she didn’t swim out? She seemed to go under on purpose. And I still love Izzie. And Alex is growing on me every episode. And I would TOTALLY notice if Addison weren’t there.

And The Office tonight was directed by Joss Whedon! aka He Who Created Buffy the Vampire Slayer. And it was awesome. There was more heart than usual, even from Michael. And there was, yep, a vampire motif. I *heart* Jim. But Pam and Roy back together? *thunk* Jim? Pam? Constantly dating other people when we all know you need to be together? Not conducive to my personal happiness.

American Idol: Top 24 Revealed

Here it is. The end of the audition round. I’m ready. :)

Sanjaya Malakar – I really like him. From what I’ve heard, everyone likes him. And he’s in! Yay!

Anna Kearns – I thought I’d seen her in the rooms, but I wasn’t sure. And she’s not in. I’m not surprised. I was a little surprised that she got as far as the top 40.

Bernard Williams – And this is the guy that Paula said was totally off-key. And he’s not in. And there’s Philip Stacy, so he did make the top 40. I couldn’t tell.

Eric Davis and Tami Gosnell – Tami was someone Simon really liked. I don’t remember seeing Eric before. Both are no.

Melinda Doolittle – She better get through. Because she’s amazing. Yay! She’s in.

Brandan Rogers – Ah, so he is there. I didn’t notice him last night. And he’s in as well.

Gina Glockson – And she’s in! She was in my second tier, but I’m really glad she made it, after making it as far as the room round last year.

Jimmy McNeal – Aw, I really liked him. But he and Errick somebody or other are both out.

Haley Scarnato – Yay! She’s the one that Simon called “cabaret” and I decided that cabaret must be my favorite. And she’s in. Woot.

Phil Stacy – I’m not horribly impressed by him. I mean, I like him, but his voice is too nasally for me. But apparently not too nasally for the judges. He’s in.

Chris Sligh – I like his sense of humor. And his voice. If he doesn’t make it through, I’ll be very surprised. Yep, he’s in. :)

Blake Lewis – I’m not sure his voice is quite up with all the others, but he’s certainly a great performer, and I really like him. And he’s through. :)

Thomas Lowe – Not through.

Rudy Cardenas – He’s borderline for me. Could take him or leave him. I guess we’re taking him; he’s in.

Paul Kim – Okay, we really didn’t need to know about the underwear. Really. NO REALLY. And he’s in. Please tell me that this lucky underwear thing allows for washing.

Jordin Sparks – HA! She is there. Okay, yeah, I did see her in the rooms, I just didn’t recognize her with her hair up. Good! I’m glad she made it in.

Okay, a couple of people we don’t know plus Tatiana McConnico, not through.

A.J. Tabaldo – Five times trying? Wow. And he’s through. Nice.

Tiffany Edwards – I remember seeing her last night, but not before that. She’s good. And in.

Leslie Hunt – Are they all singing that song? I mean, I like the song (one of Kat’s best performances last year, BTW), but still. And she’s in as well.

Nick Pedro – PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE I WANT HIM. Um, on the show I mean. Awesome! He’s in! Woot!

Hee. Are You Smarter Than a Fifth Grader. I might be amused, if I weren’t so embarrassed for the adults. Interestingly enough, when my mom or I forget something factual that we should know, we say “I knew it in fifth grade.”

Alaina Alexander – I liked her in the auditions…that Hollywood week performance wasn’t great, though. But it was good enough, apparently; she’s in. Simon was crushing on her in the auditions. Couldn’t’ve hurt. ;)

Chris Richardson – Yes! I thought I’d glimpsed him in the rooms. And he is IN! I like him, so that’s good.

Sabrina Sloane – First time we’ve seen her that I know of. And she’s in. I wonder how much time Simon spends thinking up all the ways to phrase the acceptance so it sounds like a denial. “We have decided not………to exclude you.”

Jerome Chisum, Joelle James, Matthew Buckstein (aka cowboy guy), Princess Johnson – most of whom we don’t know, all gone.

Lakisha Jones – She’s really really good. And the judges agree with me. Always nice when that happens. She’s in.

Nicole Tranquillo – I think I saw her several times last night, but not in the original auditions. In any case, she’s through.

Jared Cotter – Another new face, and he is in.

Amy Krebs – Yet another one not previously showcased, and yet another one in.

Antonella Barba and Marisa – I love me some Antonella, but I remember Marisa being really good, too. But please, Antonella, please. I hate when it’s down to two left. Oh, crap, Antonella, not lyric trouble. They HATE that. Whew. Antonella is through. I shouldn’t be surprised, though. They’ve really emphasized her throughout the audition process–apparently she’s one of the marketing darlings this year.

Tommy Daniels and Sundance Head – Both very good, though Sundance faltered a lot in Hollywood. I don’t remember seeing Thomas in Hollywood at all. I’m not sure I agree with putting Sundance through. I think they only did because he’s really different. But I guess that’s a fair reason, too.

So our top 24 are:

Alaina Alexander
Antonella Barba
Melinda Dolittle
Tiffany Edwards
Gina Glockson
Leslie Hunt
Lakisha Jones
Amy Krebs
Haley Scarnato
Sabrina Sloane
Jordin Sparks
Nicole Tranquillo

Rudy Cardenas
Jared Cotter
Sundance Head
Paul Kim
Blake Lewis
Sanjaya Malakar
Nick Pedro
Chris Richardson
Brandan Rogers
Chris Sligh
Phil Stacy
A.J. Tabaldo

And my prediction stats are 14/24, and 8 of the other 10 weren’t shown in the original auditions. Not bad.

edit to correct Amy’s last name 2/18/07

American Idol: Hollywood Week Round 1 (definite spoilers)

Hollywood, here we come. Yep, twice as many girls as guys…that’s about how the auditions we saw ratioed out. (See my picks for Top 24 two posts below this one.) Of the 48 successful auditions showcased, only 19 were guys.

Okay, Jory Steinberg. She’s one of my picks. Ooh, she and Paula are wardrobe twins. Not sure if that’s good or not… She sounded good to me. Just grabbing names for future reference: Geri Guyer, Kelly Caruso, Lisa Morrison, Christen Itam, Jeromishia Lemar. Haven’t seen any of them before. And they’re all gone. So I’m 0 for 24 so far…

Perla Meneses. She’s on my “won’t make it” list. Dude, that’s the same song she sung for the audition. Probably not a good move. Rachel Jenkins, the Reservist. I like her, but I don’t think she’s got enough. Perla’s through, Rachel’s not. I still predict Perla won’t make the final cut.

Baylie Brown. I think she’ll make it. Yep. Ashlyn Carr, Porcelana Patino, Sarah Burgess, all gone. I hoped Sarah would make the finals, but the other two don’t surprise me at all. Anyway, Sarah makes two of my picks gone. Crap. Nicole Turner–we haven’t seen her before, I don’t think.

Melinda Doolittle, Gina Glockson, Tatiana McConnico, Jamie Lynn Ward are all through. Melinda’s on my definite list, the other three on my second tier one.

Time for the guys. Four less boys than girls? Does that mean they’re picking 16 girls and 8 boys? Or did I completely mishear that?

Brian Miller. Several of them are resinging their original audition songs. Maybe that’s what they’re doing, then. My bad. I like his voice, but he just doesn’t seem all there to me. Jerrod Fowler. Navy guy! I like him. Matt Sato–not sure he’s got what it takes, either, although I have him pegged as a dark horse at this point. Oh, and there’s Chris Sligh. Ooh, Matt’s through and Jerrod’s not? Misguessed that one. But I knew Chris Sligh was going to make it through. Matt’s gotta quit with the crying, though. He’s like the male Klancie Keough (from Australian Idol).

Also through: Blake Lewis (cool!), Nick Pedro (awesome!), Phil Stacy and Sean Michel (I cut both of them for my lists).

Next up, group round. *shudder* Ooh, they have to pick their own groups? And it can be boy/girl, and different numbers of people? We’re going for maximum conflict here, apparently! Hey, one of the singing cowboys is back! My least favorite of the three! I’m abusing punctuation!! Amanda and Antonella bickering already. Great. And Baylie’s in their group, too. Three of my faves (especially Antonella)…if they can’t get it together, they’ll drag each other down. Grr. And the attack of the forgotten lyrics. Always a popular problem. Commercial teaser–one of the Amanda/Antonella/Baylie group is gone. Hope it’s Amanda. I’m sorry, was that mean? I just like the other two better.

House tonight is a patient who can’t feel pain. Didn’t Grey’s Anatomy do that like a month ago?

And they’re being really tough on lyrics. So there goes Matt. Oh, that’s Sanjaya Malakar, isn’t it? Wasn’t sure if he’d gotten through. Perla, what the hell was that? Hey, Marisa’s not bad. Yep, told you. Perla’s out. Oh, and Rudy Cardenas is through, too. Cool. Awesome group. Really uses Blake’s beatboxing to good effect. Very well done. THAT’S what group needs to do. And Sundance is still around. But not nearly as impressive as he was in auditions. But apparently impressive enough for Paula.

Ooh, Baylie, that’s some serious lyric forgetting. You’re totally screwed. But Antonella did really good, I thought. But as a group performance, it was really really weak and boring. So there goes Baylie. I thought they were going to stay friends, right? Or…not. Okay, Amanda is totally two-faced and I’m not at all happy with her. Antonella was the only one who came through that whole experience well, I think. There goes Sean Michel and Michelle Steingas. Are they going to reveal the final cut tonight? Last year they had a separate show for that. Or maybe that’s what they’ll do tomorrow? I don’t think there’s time tonight, anyway. Only eight minutes.

How in hell is Norbit the number one movie in the country? I do not understand American moviegoers. I swear, every time I see the trailer for it, my IQ drops a little, along with a few brain cells for good measure.

Now for the rooms. Room #1 includes, I believe: Gina Glockson, Haley Scarnato, Blake Lewis, Rudy Cardenas, Chris Sligh, Paul Kim, cowboy guy from last year. And they’re through. Room #2 has: Nick Pedro, Antonella Barba, Tami Gosnell, Thomas Daniels, maybe Chris Richardson, Sundance Head, Lakisha Jones, Sanjaya Malakar, Alaina Alexander. And they’re through. Good. Room #3 then, is not going through: Amanda Coluccio, Shyamali Malakar (*pout*), Jamie Lynn Ward, Brian Miller. Aw, Sanjaya’s so sweet. I love him. But I really, really, really wish Shyamali had made it through.

And Top 24 tomorrow revealed tomorrow. Here’s the list of original auditioners that went to Hollywood, chronologically by audition appearance. The bolded ones are in the final forty.

Denise Jackson – never saw during Hollywood rounds (if I say this, means I didn’t see them…could’ve been there and I missed them; could, in fact, be in that final forty, though I expect they would’ve shown them more prominently in that case)
Perla Meneses – cut during group round
Jerrod Fowler – cut during initial Hollywood round
Michelle Steingas – cut during group round
Matt Sato – cut during group round
Rachel Jenkins – cut during initial Hollywood round
Sarah Krueger – never saw during Hollywood rounds
Thomas Daniels – I believe he was in room #2, therefore, in the final forty
Blake Lewis – in the final forty
Shyamali Malakar – in room #3, cut in during last Hollywood round
Sanjaya Malakar – in the final forty
Rudy Cardenas – in the final forty, I believe
Anna Kearns? – not positive, but she may be in the room #1 and #2 reunion scene, in which case she’s in the final forty
Jordin Sparks – never saw during Hollywood rounds, but it’s quite possible I missed her–there were several people who looked sort of like her
Sundance Head – in the final forty
Danielle McCulloch – never saw during Hollywood rounds
Sean Michel – cut during group round
Melinda Doolittle – she definitely made it through the initial round, but I didn’t see her after that. Anyone? edit: Doing slo-mo on the rooms, I think she’s in room #1. Whew.
Philip Stacy – he also made it through the initial round, but I don’t remember him later.
Sarah Burgess – cut during initial round
Amanda Coluccio – in room #3, cut in the final round
Antonella Barba – in the final forty
Kia Thornton – don’t remember seeing in Hollywood
Jenry Bejarano – don’t remember seeing, which is disappointing, because he’s totally hot
Jory Steinberg – cut during initial round
Porcelana Patino – cut during initial round
Rachel Zavita – don’t remember seeing
Chris Richardson – I think he may have been in room #2, and thus in the final forty, but I wouldn’t swear to it, and I don’t remember seeing him in any of the earlier rounds
Nicholas Pedro – in the final forty
Katie Bernard – never saw her
Tatiana McConnico – she made it through the initial round, but I don’t think I saw her after that; she might be in room #2 and the final forty, but I’m by no means sure
Bernard Williams? – might possibly have been in room #1, and the final forty
Jamie Lynn Ward – in room #3, cut in the final round
Chris Sligh – in the final forty
Alaina Alexander – I was worried about her all night! But then she was in room #2, so she’s in the final forty
Brandon Rogers – don’t remember seeing him
Brian Miller – in room #3, cut from final round
Haley Scarnato – another of my early favorites, and she was in room #1, and thus in the final forty
Baylie Brown – cut from group round
Akron Watson – never saw him
Ashlyn Carr – cut from initial round
Jimmy McNeal – in the final forty
Tami Gosnell – in the final forty
Paul Kim – in the final forty
Gina Glockson – in the final forty
Ashley Cleland – never saw
Ebony Jointer – don’t remember seeing, though she was quite good and I hope I’m wrong
Lakisha Jones – I’m pretty sure she was in room #2 and therefore the final forty

Page 2 of 4

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén