{"id":19,"date":"2006-04-25T22:03:00","date_gmt":"2006-04-26T05:03:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/2006\/04\/25\/a-whole-new-world\/"},"modified":"2007-10-25T14:53:38","modified_gmt":"2007-10-25T19:53:38","slug":"a-whole-new-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/2006\/04\/a-whole-new-world\/","title":{"rendered":"A whole new world"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><strong>Italo Calvino &#8211; <em>If on a Winter&#8217;s Night a Traveler<\/em>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I&#8217;m producing too many stories at once because what I want is for you to feel, around the story, a saturation of other stories that I could tell and maybe will tell or who knows may already have told on some other occasion, a space full of stories that perhaps is simply my lifetime, where you can move in all directions, as in space, always finding stories that cannot be told until other stories are told first, and so, setting out from any moment or place you encounter always the same density of material to be told. &#8211; p.109<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Right before I wrote this passage down, I flipped through the little notebook where I write down particularly resonant passages from whatever I&#8217;m reading, and the one just before this one is from Virginia Woolf: &#8220;When one so exposes [the genius and integrity of a great novel] and sees it come to life, one exclaims in rapture, &#8216;But this is what I have always felt and known and desired!'&#8221; That&#8217;s somewhat how I feel about the Calvino quote. I&#8217;ve been thinking a lot lately about what it is that draws me to certain books (or movies, even&#8211;throughout this post when I write &#8220;read,&#8221; I also mean &#8220;watch a movie&#8221; or &#8220;watch a TV show&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>A few people I know have recently stopped watching <em>Lost<\/em> because not much is happening&#8230;this was particuarly leveled at the recent Hurley-cenric episode, which the person I was speaking with thought was superfluous, because essentially nothing happened to advance the plot. I, on the other hand, really enjoyed the Hurley episode, and am more interested in <em>Lost<\/em> right now that I have been for a while. (I&#8217;ll admit that part of my love for that particular episode was the resemblence it bore to &#8220;Normal Again,&#8221; one of my favorite <em>Buffy the Vampire Slayer<\/em> episodes, in which Buffy gets injected with a drug which makes her think she&#8217;s actually in a mental institution, and the whole vampire slaying thing and all her friends, her entire world in fact, are hallucinations&#8230;and the episode leaves the possibility open that the mental institution reality is actually the correct one.)<\/p>\n<p><!-- more -->Back to the point. The Calvino passage points a little bit to why that I liked the Hurley episode despite the fact that, admittedly, the plot wasn&#8217;t furthered really at all. I&#8217;ve known for a long time that I don&#8217;t read primarily for the event&#8230;in fact, I care so little for the actual outcome of novels that I can reread mysteries because I will completely forget who committed the crime. I read more for the characters, but even that&#8217;s not completely it. Then I thought, well, maybe I read for the world that the author creates. This is much closer to the truth, and explains why I enjoy books like Jasper Fforde&#8217;s Tuesday Next series so much, despite the undistinguished characters and gaping plotholes. Yet it isn&#8217;t a sense of &#8220;place&#8221; that I want, because as C.S. Lewis points out in <em>An Experiment in Criticism<\/em>, some books that I quite enjoy, like <em>The Three Musketeers,<\/em> have almost no sense of place. We know it&#8217;s set in the court of France and a little bit in England only because the narrator tells us so, not because the physical setting invades the prose, as does <em>Crime and Punishment<\/em>&#8216;s Petersburg or Faulkner&#8217;s South.<\/p>\n<p>But Calvino has just nailed pretty much on the head what most makes me enjoy a book (or movie or TV show): the sense that the characters and the world have many more stories that they could tell. The world of <em>Lost<\/em> will always be rich because there is more to it than just the island; there&#8217;s more to find out than just what happens next in real time; there are all the back stories of each character and how they intersect (or do they intersect? Are the stories we see reliable?), there are the stories of The Others, who they are and were and what they want, the story of the island itself and the Dharma Initiative. I don&#8217;t want to rush along the main plotline, because I want to hear as many of these other stories as I can, and yet always know that there are even more that I will never hear. I want to find out what happens to the survivors, but ultimately I like the process of finding out more than actually finding out. (Back to the rereading mysteries thing: I love the detecting work and the <em>process<\/em> of solving the mystery, but the resolution is almost always a letdown.)<\/p>\n<p><em>Lord of the Rings<\/em> is perhaps the best example of a detailed world. Even without knowing that Tolkein actually did create and write dozens of other stories and histories of Middle Earth that aren&#8217;t told in the <em>Lord of the Rings<\/em> trilogy, the books carry a weightiness that can only be attributed to the density of available stories that may or may not ever be told. That richness is, more than anything else, what will completely entrall me. For the exact opposite of this, try something like Dan Brown&#8217;s <em>Digital Fortress<\/em>, which I read this month and has taken its place at the pinnacle of a pantheon I like to call &#8220;Worst.Books.Ever.&#8221; More on this in my month-end recap, which I&#8217;ll post sometime this year. (March&#8217;s is almost finished, I swear!) <em>Digital Fortress<\/em> has characters which interact only with each other. There are no characters introduced AT ALL which are not integral to the plot. The main character mentions several times that she and her fiance were planning to go on a vacation on the Smoky Mountains until work got in the way, but you don&#8217;t get any sense that the Smoky Mountains exist outside of her mentioning them&#8211;you don&#8217;t even feel like she really wants to go there, because she is so focused on her job and the plot at hand that there&#8217;s no room in her character for anything else. It&#8217;s a sterile environment, with static and confined characters. There are other stories hinted at occasionally&#8230;the lawbreaking hacker life of one of the cryptographers, the youth of a bitter young Japanese programmer&#8230;but they are only brought up for their immediate relevance to the main plot, and then dropped completely. There&#8217;s no sense that anything else ever happened to these people other than what we are told in the book. Not good for me. Not good at all.<\/p>\n<p>Give me depth, give me breadth, give me complexity, give me density, give me imagination, give me richness, give me possibility.<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Italo Calvino &#8211; If on a Winter&#8217;s Night a Traveler: I&#8217;m producing too many stories at once because what I want is for you to feel, around the story, a saturation of other stories that I could tell and maybe will tell or who knows may already have told on some other occasion, a space [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[426,427,447,446,445],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":34,"url":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/2006\/05\/april-readingwatching-recap\/","url_meta":{"origin":19,"position":0},"title":"April Reading\/Watching Recap","author":"Jandy","date":"May 28, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"This month, my reactions to Broken Flowers, Thank You for Smoking, Sophie Scholl, Inside Man, War of the Worlds, The Constant Gardener, Crash, Digital Fortress, If on a winter's night a traveler, and more. Movies Broken Flowers I'd heard some really great things about this film, and perhaps my expectations\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Books and Reading&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Books and Reading","link":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/category\/books\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":12511,"url":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/2010\/12\/jealous-of-story\/","url_meta":{"origin":19,"position":1},"title":"Jealous of Story","author":"Jandy","date":"December 9, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"One thing that nearly always grabs my interest in any book or film is an explicit focus on storytelling itself - that can be anything from Italo Calvino's playing with different genres\/ways to tell a story in If on a Winter's Night a Traveler to the suggestion in Terry Gilliam's\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Books and Reading&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Books and Reading","link":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/category\/books\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/12\/feat.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":960,"url":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/2008\/02\/fb100-95-run-lola-run\/","url_meta":{"origin":19,"position":2},"title":"FB100: #95 &#8211; Run Lola Run","author":"Jandy","date":"February 1, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"This post is part of a project to watch the Film Bloggers' 100 Favorite Non-English Films. See my progress here. Run Lola Run (Lola Rennt) Germany 1998; dir: Tom Tykwer starring: Franka Potente, Moritz Bliebtreu screened 1\/28\/08, DVD \"I wish I was a heartbeat that never comes to rest.\" Previous\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Film&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Film","link":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/category\/film\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":171,"url":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/2007\/01\/best-of-2006\/","url_meta":{"origin":19,"position":3},"title":"Best of 2006","author":"Jandy","date":"January 2, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"I'm not quite finished with the December reading\/watching recap, but since publishing \"best of\" lists is the thing to do at the end of the year, I figured I could go ahead and do that. And by \"best of 2006\" I mean \"best that I saw or read in 2006,\"\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Books and Reading&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Books and Reading","link":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/category\/books\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":36494,"url":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/2016\/11\/challenge-week-43-true-stories\/","url_meta":{"origin":19,"position":4},"title":"Challenge Week 43: True Stories","author":"Jandy","date":"November 17, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"When Steve gave me this film to watch, he said I'd either love it or hate it. When a film is pitched to me like that, it's actually pretty common for me to be somewhere in the middle on it, which I guess is weird. Anyway, that particular maxim holds\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;2016 Movie Challenge&quot;","block_context":{"text":"2016 Movie Challenge","link":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/category\/film\/2016-movie-challenge\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/11\/tf-feat-true_stories.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":920,"url":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/2008\/01\/best-of-2007-or-yay-more-lists\/","url_meta":{"origin":19,"position":5},"title":"Best of 2007; or, Yay More Lists!","author":"Jandy","date":"January 5, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"Well, it's that time of year. And while most critics seem to be bemoaning to one degree or another the expectation that they compile year-end top ten lists, I still relish list-making, even though any list I might make is going to woefully incomplete. This year I saw 182 movies,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Books and Reading&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Books and Reading","link":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/category\/books\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.the-frame.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}