Month: October 2008

Film Classics: Mickey One

Mickey One

directed by Arthur Penn
starring: Warren Beatty, Alexandra Stewart, Hurt Hatfield, Franchot Tone
USA 1965; screened 19 September 2008 at the Silent Movie Theatre, Los Angeles

In the mid-1960s, Warren Beatty worked to push the envelope of possible leading man roles in Hollywood. Influenced by the anti-heroes and non-commital style of the French New Wave, he sought as actor and producer to move away from the typical pretty boy roles in bland films that other Hollywood actors were performing.

In the rarely-screened Mickey One, he plays a stand-up comic on the run from the mobsters who gave him his start and now own him. Such a plot sounds like the set-up for a farce along the lines of Some Like It Hot, but in the hands of Beatty and director Arthur Penn, it becomes instead a dark, paranoia-filled trip through the underbelly of the nightclub industry. It’s never entirely clear whether the mob is still after Mickey as he slowly returns to the stage, supported by Jenny, the girl who urges him that his fears are unfounded. The hints that they are may merely be in his head, transferred to the audience through our identification with him.

Unfortunately, Beatty and Penn don’t always get the tonal balance between American crime film and New Wave drama quite right. New Wave heroes project a devil-may-care bravado even over their inner fears – a confidence Mickey can’t even believably feign most of the time. He desperately wants to know who exactly is after him, why, and what he can do to either confront and eliminate them or escape them permanently; but he is too afraid to actually try to find out – until the end when recklessness overcomes even his paranoia. The only times the awkward tension between deterministic apathy and paranoid truth-seeking seems to work unequivocally are during Mickey’s comedy routines (including his impromptu goofing when he first meets Jenny). When he’s performing, his forced bravado and tormented anguish merge uncomfortably, yes, but believably, turning him into the chatty version of Truffaut and Godard’s quietly desperate characters – he just wears his desperation on the outside instead.

The difficulty of melding New Wave styles into American film stems, to some degree, from the philosophical differences between France and the United States in the early to mid 1960s. France had lost two World Wars (or won only with foreign aid after surrendering), undergone a painful conflict with Algeria, and was nearing the political upheavals of the late 1960s – combined with the influence of existentialism, the fatalism of New Wave heroes is not wholly unexpected. The United States was still riding the tail end of the post-war boom, and though American noir of the 1940s and 50s had its share of existential heroes, American films tend to be more optimistic. (And the 1960s mainstream Hollywood that Beatty was reacting against could be almost sickeningly optimistic.) Yet, it’s not an impossible feat – Beatty and Penn would incorporate New Wave style into a quintessentially American story perfectly only two years later in Bonnie & Clyde. So count Mickey One as a not wholly successful but still extremely interesting and worthwhile experiment on the way to the heights of Bonnie & Clyde.

*note: I’m sure there are other influences on Mickey One; Cassavetes seems probable. I use the New Wave because I’m more familiar with it, and sort of in love with it right now. Plus the programmer at the Silent Movie Theatre mentioned the New Wave in relation to Mickey One and Bonnie & Clyde, so I had it in my head while I was watching the film.

Above Average

Random Review – Pirates of the Caribbean: At World’s End

I’ve had this written forever, and would’ve sworn I had posted it, but a quick search showed I hadn’t. Huh. Well, I’m sure that knowing PotC3 sucked is not earth-shattering information to anyone, but I might as well post it anyway.

I should’ve expected it to be bad. I suppose that liking Pirates of the Caribbean 2 more than most critics gave me a false sense of security going into it. It’s not like I expected it to be good, but it’s actually worse than I ever dreamed. Only the fact that it’s the third of a wildly successful trilogy (and, now, apparently quadrilogy – I die a little inside every time I remember they’re planning a fourth one) explains how this mess made it through production without someone at every stage of development stopping and saying, “wait – this makes zero sense on any level – cognitive, emotional, thematic – and it’s not even exciting!” There’s far too much going on, it all takes far too long, and somehow it manages to both go too fast to be comprehensible and too slow to be interesting (or perhaps it’s uninteresting because, contrary to current studio thinking, loads of action set pieces do not automatically yield interest without a compelling and comprehensible plot – and having loads of profoundly stupid and long exposition in between the set pieces doesn’t help either).

There are two good scenes. The haunting opening depicts several pirates, including a young boy, singing as they’re awaiting execution by hanging. That sinister mood is quickly dispelled by the utter idiocy that takes over the screen soon after. The other good scene is set in Jack Sparrow’s hell, surreally blank and peopled with duplicates of himself (splinters, really, each taking a part of his personality to an extreme). But that surreal quality completely fails to mesh with the rest of the film, either, which makes it ultimately stand out in a less positive way. Literally everything else in the movie should’ve been scrapped. In the script drafting stage.

Well Below Average
USA 2007; dir: Gore Verbinski; starring: Johnny Depp, Orlando Bloom, Keira Knightley
Screened 13 July 2008 on DVD

Desperate Housewives Confusion

Okay, so I didn’t watch any of the Desperate Housewives episodes after the writer’s strike last year. I did read some overarching recaps, but I’m still a little confused after watching the premiere last week. Could someone who did watch the end of last season help me out a little?

1) Where is Julie? Susan’s son shows up a time or two, but there’s no mention at all of Julie. Did she leave somewhere last season? College or something?

2) Where are Tom and Lynette’s other kids? I think we only saw the twins in the premiere episode – what about the other son and daughter?

3) In the flashback when Danielle came to take Benjamin from Bree, Bree mentioned Orson being gone – but he’s not gone in the premiere. Did he leave her last season and then come back, or is that flashback taking place between seasons and we just don’t know what went on with that?

4) Did Carlos lose his sight in the tornado, or sometime after that?

Page 2 of 2

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén