Category: Film Page 76 of 101

Film Classics – Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans

Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans

directed by F.W. Murnau
starring George O’Brien, Janet Gaynor, Margaret Livingston
USA 1927; screened 8 July 2008 at the Silent Movie Theatre, Los Angeles

Let me just quickly tell you about me and Sunrise: A Song of Two Humans. It’s been on my see-soon list for years, as one of the most highly regarded silent films ever. Initially I added it to my Netflix queue, knowing it had been released on DVD as part of a Fox box set though not individually. Netflix apparently lost their copy or something and decided not to replace it, putting in the “unavailable” section of my queue instead. Plan B: Wait for it to come on during TCM’s Silent Sunday Nights or 31 Days of Oscar program. Several months later, it did, and I smiled and set my DVR. Which decided to flake and tape only the first five minutes. Foiled again. About a year later, I moved to LA and what should be showing at the local repertory cinema? Yep, Sunrise accompanied by a live band with an original score. And it was one of the best cinematic experiences of my life, so apparently the cinema powers-that-be just knew that I needed to wait and see it in a cinema rather than on DVD or TV. Thank you.

I’ve heard over and over that silent film had reached a heady apex of artistry by the 1920s that was shattered by the coming of sound and its attendant clunky equipment, but I’m not sure I ever fully believed in the poetic power of silent film as a fully realized art form until I saw Sunrise. I’d been impressed by individual elements of several silent films – the physical comedy of Buster Keaton, the pathos of Charlie Chaplin, the Expressionist oddness of The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari - but never had I seen a film that combines the traditional qualities of silent film with a such a timeless sense of humanity and beauty.

The story is simple. A husband ignores his sweet but inconsequential wife in favor of a femme fatale (or vamp, since we’re in the 1920s) from the big city. The vamp convinces the husband to kill the wife to get her out of the way, but as he’s about to do this, he can’t and instead takes the wife to the city and they reconstitute their love. The very simplicity of the story, however, is what allows director F.W. Murnau room to exercise his Expressionist-influenced visual flair and create a dark, moody landscape for the characters to inhabit.

Near the beginning, the vamp coyly leads the husband through the wet and disorienting marshes near his farm, a scene ripe for interpretation by Freudian critics, let me just say. Similarly, the near-murder scene is overacted by both the husband and the wife, but Murnau uses the overdetermined silent movie acting style to great psychological advantage – out of context, the scene could easily be laughable today, but no one in the cinema was laughing. Later, the city is a bustling, dangerous place, showcasing the physicality and motion that silent films perfected before sound came and changed the game.

Though I’m far from seeing all the silent films available (which is still only a small percentage of the ones that were made), I feel fairly confident in declaring that Sunrise represents the epitome of silent film art. It’s not for nothing that it won “Outstanding Artistic Achievement” at the first ever Academy Awards – an award that was never given again. If you can see it in a cinema, do. Otherwise, keep your eye on TCM, as they do play it occasionally.

Favorite Films, One Letter at a Time

I rarely organize my collections alphabetically, at least not as the major organizational tool, since the letter the title starts with is usually less meaningful than the year it was made or the genre that it’s in. But there’s a meme going around film blogs (starting with Blog Cabins) to choose one favorite film that starts with each letter of the alphabet. Forcing you to pick something from each letter is generating some interesting results, so I thought I’d give it a try. (Other entries I’ve seen include: Only the Cinema, Film Doctor, The House Next Door, and Spoutblog.)

Shameless self-promotion – this task was made a lot easier since I recently completed a full list of all the films I’ve ever seen over at my archive site. Still working on the ancillary lists organized by year and rating, but the by title one is done.

AThe Adventures of Robin Hood (1938; Michael Curtiz & William Keighley)
BBand of Outsiders (1964; Jean-Luc Godard)
CCity of Lost Children (1995; Jean-Pierre Jeunet)
DThe Double Life of Veronique (1993; Krzysztof Kieslowski)
EElection (1999; Alexander Payne)
FThe Fountain (2006; Darren Aronofsky)
GGentlemen Prefer Blondes (1953; Howard Hawks)
HA Hard Day’s Night (1964; Richard Lester)
IIn a Lonely Place (1951; Nicholas Ray)
JJFK (1991; Oliver Stone)
KKey Largo (1948; John Huston)
LLock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels (1998; Guy Ritchie)
MMulholland Drive (2001; David Lynch)
NThe Naked Kiss (1964; Samuel Fuller)
OO Brother Where Art Thou (2000; Joel & Ethan Coen)
PPersona (1966; Ingmar Bergman)
QThe Quiet Man (1952; John Ford)
RRear Window (1954; Alfred Hitchcock)
SSunrise: A Song of Two Humans (1927; F.W. Murnau)
TThe Thin Man (1934; W.S. Van Dyke)
UThe Umbrellas of Cherbourg (1964; Jacques Demy)
VVertigo (1958; Alfred Hitchcock)
WThe Women (1939; George Cukor)
XX-Men (2000; Bryan Singer)
YYoung Frankenstein (1974; Mel Brooks)
ZZodiac (2007; David Fincher)

Anyone else reading this, please feel free to post your own. Consider yourself tagged.

Horror Clip Quiz Answers

Okay, here are the answers to the horror clip montage quiz. Congrats to Vonnie, who got the most right, with 5! Kat got 4, Polter-Cow and icubud each got 3, and logical extremes got the one black and white one that everyone else missed. Thanks for playing, guys!

Here’s the montage again, to refresh your memory:

Horror Montage from faithx5 on Vimeo.

The films included are: The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920), Nosferatu (1922), Cat People (1942), I Walked With a Zombie (1943), Psycho (1960), Night of the Living Dead (1968), and the color one that eluded everyone is Guillermo del Toro’s The Devil’s Backbone (2001). I thought that one might be harder, being foreign and not really initiated into the annals of horror classics like the others, but I *heart* it.

No one tried naming the clips in order, but here’s that:
1 – I Walked With a Zombie (Carrefour’s shadow)
2 – I Walked With a Zombie (Carrefour entering the plantation)
3 – Nosferatu (Dracula rising from the coffin on the ship)
4 – Night of the Living Dead (the undead advancing on the house)
5 – The Devil’s Backbone (Carlos descending the stairs to the haunted cellar)
6 – I Walked With a Zombie (the first real sight of Zombie!Jessica)
7 – The Devil’s Backbone (Santi touching Carlos on the shoulder)
8 – Nosferatu (Dracula entering Jonathan’s room)
9 – I Walked With a Zombie (extreme Carrefour closeup)
10 – Cat People (extreme Irena closeup)
11 – Psycho (extreme mother closeup)
12 – Night of the Living Dead (zombie!child attacks)
13 – Psycho (shower attack)
14 – The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (the somnambulist attacks)
15 – Night of the Living Dead (all the zombies attack)
16 – Cat People (the cat attacks) [there’s a cut in this clip, so it seems like two clips, but it isn’t; both the shadows against the fireplace/wall and the panther-decorated shade are from Cat People]
17 – Psycho (Norman runs from the Bates home to the motel)
18 – The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (the mountebank flees)
19 – The Devil’s Backbone (the door to the cellar/Santi on the water) [there’s a fade in this clip, but it’s all one clip]
20 – Nosferatu (Dracula gets burned up) [there’s a cut in this clip, from Dracula at the window to his smoking remains on the floor]
21 – Cat People (Irena after being attacked)
22 – Psycho (Marion after the shower attack)

Quiz: Guess the Horror Clips

So I’ve been wanting to throw some quizzes out there because I always enjoy when other blogs do that. But quote quizzes were overdone years ago, and everyone does screencap quizzes, so I decided to go the extra step: a video quiz. Which is more work than I originally intended, largely because I only have Windows MovieMaker – which is cool for clipping TV shows, but less than optimal for actually editing; actually, it’s a piece of crap. But it does accept Xvid-encoded .avi files, which a lot of higher-end editing programs don’t, so there’s that. Anyway.

Most of these are going to be REALLY easy for connoisseurs of horror movies, especially classic horror movies, because I didn’t want to get too obscure all at once, and because I’m still working on getting over my dislike of horror, so most of these are fairly well known. There might be a couple that’ll test you, though. And there’s at least one that anyone should get.

So here’s the deal. You get one point for each film in the montage you can name. I won’t tell you how many films there are total (but I will say there are multiple clips from each film, and they aren’t contiguous). And you get lots of points if you can name all the clips in order. Basically, if you do that, you win. :) There’s no prize, so it’s okay if multiple people win. Go ahead and guess in the comments, and I’ll edit the post with scores. And please, people, guess! I’d like to do things like this more often, but I probably won’t if no one cares.


Horror Montage from faithx5 on Vimeo.

Happy Halloween everybody!

Scoreboard:
Vonnie – 5
Kat – 4
Polter-Cow – 3
icubud – 3
logical extremes – 1 (got the other B&W film that no-one had guessed; I bet you knew some of the others, though, too)

Some music from here, released under an attribution Creative Commons license.

Edit: Also, I swear I hadn’t watched Jonathan Lapper’s latest Killfest video yet when I chose the last shot – it’s just the perfect ending shot to every murder/killing/horror movie montage, is all.

[If you’re reading this in a feedreader, you may need to click through to see the video.]

Touch of Evil Aspect Ratio Outcry


I don’t really have anything to add to this discussion, but I have to love the fact that cinephiles are up in arms over the the new Universal edition of Touch of Evil, which has three different cuts of the film (the 1958 studio-cut theatrical version, a pre-studio-interference preview version, and the 1998 restored version), but fails to display any of them in the originally shot 1.37:1 aspect ratio, instead using the 1.85:1 widescreen ratio. Dave Kehr has a post with video clips showing the difference and his post has garnered some 350 comments arguing for one aspect ratio or another (I didn’t read them all, I admit). There’s also a ton of discussion, with screencaps, going on at Criterion Forum. Glenn Kenny joins in with a bit more info on the history of the multiple ratios.

I’m so used to arguing for widescreen over pan-and-scan when going from 1.85:1 or 2.35:1 theatrical formats to 1.33:1 televisions that it seems strange to hear arguments for fullscreen over widescreen. But sure enough, looking at the clips Kehr posted, there’s definitely a more claustrophobic feel to the widescreen one. On the other hand, several of the shots did look better framed to me in widescreen. According to Kenny, it seems likely that Welles intended to shoot 1.37:1, not taking into account that the film would be matted to 1.85:1 for release. Frankly, it’s a fantastic film in any form, but now I’m curious to see the whole thing in both ratios.

So apparently after two DVD releases of Touch of Evil, there’s still room for one more. :) I’ll be on the lookout for the 4-version edition.

Page 76 of 101

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén