Category: Film Page 61 of 101

50 Day Movie Challenge

This challenge has been going around on Facebook and a friend is doing it on his blog, too. Since I’m not that much of a Facebook person, and am always looking for good blogging motivation, I thought I’d take up his idea and do it here.

Basically it’s a set of 50 questions encouraging you to answer specific questions with a few paragraphs and a movie clip. I think the original challenge is more clip-specific, but some of my answers don’t have clips on YouTube, so I’ll do my best to use clips, but images may have to do in some cases. Lots of these questions are pretty tough, and lots of them could also have a different answer if you asked me next week. In any case, they’re all good for getting thoughts flying freely and discussion going.

Here’s the full list of questions:

1) Your favorite movie
2) The first movie you remember seeing in theatres
3) The movie you’ve seen the most (repeatedly) in your life
4) Your favorite animated film
5) Your favorite documentary
6) Your least favorite movie by your favorite director
7) Your favorite movie soundtrack
8) Your favorite opening sequence
9) Your favorite movie ending
10) The movie that least deserved to win Best Picture at the Oscars
11) A movie you walked out on in theatres
12) Your favorite male performance
13) Your favorite female performance
14) A movie that made you cry
15) Biggest movie character crush
16) The scariest movie you’ve ever seen
17) The funniest movie you’ve ever seen
18) A movie that disturbed you
19) A movie you’re surprised you enjoyed
20) A movie you thought you would love but were disappointed
21) A movie that most fans and critics loved (but you hated)
22) A movie that most fans and critics hated (but you loved)
23) A movie you think is critically or commercially overrated
24) The most beautiful movie you’ve ever seen
25) The best-scripted movie you’ve ever seen
26) The most embarrassing movie in your personal collection
27) An iconic movie that you still haven’t seen
28) A movie you REFUSE to see
29) The one movie you think everyone should see
30) The last movie you saw in theatres
31) The worst movie you’ve ever seen
32) Favorite sequel
33) Favorite remake
34) favorite series
35) Favorite book-to-screen adaptation
36) Most Uncomfortable Date Movie
37) A film you could never watch with your parents
38) Movie World that you would most want to live in
39) Favourite Musical
40) Favourite Movie Death
41) A film that you quote most
42) A movie that you would love to tour the locations for
43) Your favourite music scene from a non-musical
44) Your favourite comfort film
45) A movie that turned you on
46) A film you would like to remake
47) Currently unfilmed book or idea that should be a film
48) Movie Scene That Most Makes You Wince
49) A Movie that will always make you think of a special moment
50) Favourite Black and white film

I’m going to do my darndest to get one of these in every day, and I’ll link them from this post as I do them.

LA Film Fest 2011: Day 8 (Friday)

Friday’s screenings didn’t start quite so early as Wednesday’s and Thursday’s had, so I was able to sleep a little bit more before heading to work. Not sure if that extra half-hour or so made that much different, or if my body managed to adjust to four hours of sleep, but I was much less tired all day on Friday, and didn’t really have any issues with being sleepy during films. I figured it would get worse throughout the week, not better. Interesting. The reason I’m so fascinated with this aspect is that this is by far my most ambitious film festival schedule. I had twenty-five films plus a shorts program scheduled, running from 4pm to midnight almost every weekday and 1pm to midnight for two weekends. That’s basically full-time job hours on top of my full-time job, so I was actually expecting to fade toward the end of the week and have to start skipping screenings, but it didn’t happen. I made it to everything I had planned, and though I did fade in and out of some of the later films, it was far more minimal than I expected.

The festival was running a special sidebar of films from or focusing on Cuba, and I wanted to make it to one of those at least to fill out my fest experience. I chose Suite Habana, a film from 2003, both for scheduling reasons and because it sounded like a Havana-set version of Berlin: Symphony of a City or Man With a Movie Camera, a sort of documentary-esque tone poem focusing on a specific city. And that’s exactly what it is – it follows a group of people around their daily lives in Havana for a twenty-four hour period. We see a man and his nine-year-old son, a construction worker who dances ballet at night, an old woman who sells peanuts, a drag queen performer, and many others. At the time, Cuba was still suffering greatly from the blockade of the US and the loss of economic support from the Soviet Union, and that shows in every frame, and yet the people go on, pursuing their dreams and taking care of their families with hope. The whole film is lovely and sometimes sad, with a great score to underscore the basically wordless action. The very end is extremely effective, introducing us to each of the people we’ve been watching with their name, their job, and their dream, after we’ve already gotten to know them a bit just by watching them. The cinematographer of the film was there answering questions, and it was great to hear that a lot of them are having their dreams fulfilled – the ballet dancer is with the national Cuban ballet company, and was actually in LA last week performing with them. Originally there was meant to be several films to go along with Suite Habana, with different directors showing their home cities for a 24-hour period, but funding fell through and Suite Habana was the only one completed. I’d love to see more “city” films like this – I find them quite fascinating.

It seems like I put very few straight dramas on my schedule – almost everything is a genre film of some sort or a comedy, or a black comedy. But Kawasaki’s Rose is one, and an extremely good one. I was first drawn to it because it’s Czech, and I’m kind of fascinated by the Czech Republic and its history, and then I discovered it’s the same director (Jan Hrebejk) who did Divided We Fall back in 2001, a film that just bowled me over when I saw it. Like Divided We Fall, Kawasaki’s Rose deals with the issue of collaborators and dissidents during the Soviet occupation of Czechoslovakia, but from the other side. Main character Pavel (well, it’s a pretty solid ensemble cast, so after seeing it, it’s difficult to pin anyone as the main character) is about to receive an award for his outspoken dissident efforts, but as a pair of documentarians (one of them his son-in-law, the other his son-in-law’s mistress – yeah, it’s complicated) work on the story, they discover that at one time, he had collaborated with the KGB. There are a ton of plot threads in this film, of Pavel and his wife Jana, who may or may not have known about his activity; their daughter Lucie, who not only has a straying husband, but a kid who’s a bit of a punk and a rare medical condition; Jana’s former lover Borek, a dissident who fled Prague not long before Jana and Pavel married, and Borek’s Japanese expat buddy Kawasaki, and more. But they all manage to find their way back to the center, unveiling layers like the origami rose Kawasaki paints which gives the film its title. It could get soapy, but it doesn’t – it has a lot of depth to it, stemming both from the characters and the historical background. I’m not sure it’s quite as amazing as Divided We Fall was when I first saw that, but together they make a darn good double feature about the Czech experience.

A horror-thriller about a barista in Silver Lake, with what seemed like a stalker angle? Sign me…up? Heh, I’m always curious about indie horror films, even though there are a lot of them, that seem to take more of a thoughtful point of view on the genre rather than just going for the whole slasher thing. Funnily enough, the filmmakers’ working title for Entrance was “Slasher,” but it certainly isn’t a typical one. Most of the film is, in fact, a straight drama, with the main character Suzie (played by Suziey Block, who is also a barista in Silver Lake) getting pretty lonely and disaffected, soon deciding she wants to leave LA entirely. This sounds like a dozen other films, because disaffected Angeleno stories are fairly easy things for low-budget LA filmmakers to write and film. But it actually pretty much works on that level, even leaving aside the horror stuff – it’s not particularly distinguished at it, but it’s decent, for which most of the credit goes to Block, who is quite personable and imminently believable. Throughout, an odd undercurrent runs, though, as she wakes to hear footsteps she can’t quite track down, her dog goes missing, her garage doors are randomly open, etc. When the climax comes, it’s quite well done, with a lot of smart choices on the part of the writers and directors; it did get a little drawn out toward the end, though, and I thought that could’ve been tightened up a fair bit. But I still enjoyed myself with it (and didn’t get too scared to move to the Silver Lake area, which I’m still hoping to do EVENTUALLY), and so did most of the rest of the audience – many of whom were there supporting friends in the cast or crew. It was the world premiere of the film, and it’s fun to be in that friendly an audience for that.

LA Film Fest 2011: Day 7 (Thursday)

Thursday was my earliest day yet, as I booked it up to the theatre for a 4:00pm screening. I’ve actually enjoyed getting to work so early, even if the four-hour nights of sleep were starting to wear on me by Thursday. The commute from 6:30-7:00 is 100 times better than the one from 7:30-8:00. As in, I can make it by 7am if I leave by 6:30, but if I wait until 7:30, I probably won’t get there until 8:30. Gotta love LA traffic. But yeah, this week has been a good experiment in different traffic conditions at different times.

The screening I was running to was of Echo Park-set teen drama Mamitas, which intrigued me both because I like seeing films set in different neighborhoods of Los Angeles, and because the trailer reminded me of Raising Victor Vargas, a Latino-American coming-of-age drama from a few years ago I liked very much. And I wasn’t wrong in my intuition; Mamitas is a really charming understated drama of a teenage boy who puts of a front of being hot stuff – cutting class, hitting on girls, generally acting too cool for school – but shows a much more caring side to his ailing grandfather and one girl who manages to break through his facade. It’s all played very down-to-earth and realistically, with all the actors bringing great warmth and charisma to their roles. A plot development that could’ve gone very eye-rollingly soapy refreshingly didn’t, and I appreciated that immensely. The only problem is that the film is 110 minutes, and it should’ve been about 95, trimming off a couple of false endings. But I was enough charmed that I didn’t care too much.

I’d been looking forward to Another Earth since I first heard about it a few months back – the premise is that one day, a new planet turns up in the sky, and upon further investigation and SETI contact, it becomes clear that not only is it an exactly duplicate of Earth in terms of terrain and geographical layout, but every person on Earth is duplicated on Earth 2, with the same lives and everything. The trailer gave me a bit of pause, though, since it suggested that the sci-fi angle was only background to the story of a woman who caused a terrible car accident trying to find forgiveness and redemption, and that looked like it could go off the maudlin emo deep end in a real hurry. And…it kind of did. The trailer, if you watch it, is quite a good representation of the film. The main character finds the one survivor of the accident and tries to improve his life in any way she can, with the thought always in the back of her mind of going to Earth 2 when a passenger shuttle launches in a few months, hoping that meeting the other her or the duplicates of the accident victims will help her find peace. It doesn’t play as emo as I feared, and a lot of the emotional side is handled really well, to the film’s credit. But it does go to some strange places in tone and content, which I’m not sure were actually helpful to the film overall. Ultimately, I was intrigued by some parts, especially the sci-fi parts that I wanted a LOT more of, and disappointed by other parts, for a rather uneven and unfulfilling experience. I’m not sure who the audience for this is, either – it won’t please hardcore sci-fi fans, but it’s also too downright strange (and I don’t just mean the sci-fi elements, but stylistically) to appeal to the mainstream. The last shot was really good, though, and brought forth a tumult of thoughts and speculation, so I guess I’ll give it props for that.

I was pretty worried that sleep was going to catch up with me during The Yellow Sea, and I must admit to dozing off during quite a few of the more exposition-laden parts, but I still got the basic gist and I certainly was not dozing during the adrenaline-pumping action scenes. This is a Korean crime film, focusing on a Chinese-Korean man living in China who gets assigned a hit in Korea, so he makes the dangerous and illegal crossing over the Yellow Sea to get there. But predictably, stuff goes wrong, and he ends up being chased by the police, the mob leaders (who he thinks ordered the hit but apparently did not and are upset it happened), and the middleman who smuggled him across the Sea. Then all these groups of people get into it with each other, top. So, yeah, it takes a while to get going, but once it does, it’s pretty incredible – and most of it is on-foot chases and knife fights. No guns at all. The most amazing thing is the chases (both on-foot and car) are shot really close and edited quickly, but somehow they managed not to be incoherent the way most American action scenes are – I felt the visceral rush of him narrowly missing being hit or caught, or cars slamming into each other behind him, but I never felt disoriented. I want to watch it again just to try to analyze how they achieved that effect.

LA Film Fest 2011: Day Six (Wednesday)

Wednesday I got up and went to work early so I could leave by 3:15 to get to a 4:10 screening. Dedication, I tell you. Dedication. Really, though, I’m thankful for how close LA Live is to where I work, and that my boss is so flexible in letting me do stuff like this. It’s a pretty great situation. And the proximity of LA Live almost makes me forgive the Fest for choosing downtown (where it’s very difficult to find fast, cheap food to eat on a festival schedule) over Hollywood, which is more convenient for not starving to death, but an hour away from work in traffic. Ah, well, can’t have everything.

Anyway, my early morning Wednesday allowed me to add Familiar Ground to my schedule, a Quebecois film I’d circled around in planning but had left off before I realized I could get to the 4pm screenings. It was billed as a black comedy about a deeply unhappy family focusing on a sibling relationship, with a random sci-fi element of a man coming from the future (not the distant future, just September), offering warnings to the brother about an accident the sister might have soon. The sci-fi bit I intrigued me, but I wasn’t sure about the deeply unhappy bit. Ultimately curiosity won out, plus I want to see more Canadian film, Quebecois or otherwise. The funny thing about French language films is you can almost always find trailers on YouTube if you search “bande-annonce” – but they’re unsubtitled and I’m utterly unable to understand any Quebecois French, even though I can usually get the gist of France French from bande-annonce clips. Anyway, watching that told me NOTHING about the film, so I was going in pretty blind. Ended up liking it quite a bit, though it’s not really a friendly film. It’s slow and rather antagonistic (as the main characters are), but it is quite funny in an extremely deadpan and slightly absurd way. The lightly techno/synthy soundtrack is really unexpected but works really well. It’s a film I liked much more thinking about it later than while actually watching it. I expect I would like it even more on rewatch.

I had a little bit of time before my next screening, so I went in search of food. And here’s what I mean. There’s food in the theatre, which is what I did last year, but I’d rather avoid that if possible for actual meals. There’s a taco truck across the street, but I was not in the mood for Mexican food. LA Live has a wide range of great restaurants – if you have time to sit and eat and want to spend $15+ for an entree. There’s a Denny’s Diner not too far away, but I did that on Saturday and wasn’t eager to do it again. There was a panini place a few blocks over and I headed toward that, but by the time I found it, it was starting to get late and it was more of a sit-down place than I expected. Then I noticed a Ralph’s grocery store right there and decided to just do that. Even their pasta salad bars were almost $10. I bought a box of Cheez-Its and a Mountain Dew for $4 total. Done. I’ve been eating those for three days now. Healthy? No. But cheap and does the job. Please, LA Film Fest, get some more food trucks other than tacos in the area next year.

After the food odyssey, I got back to join an already lengthy line for The Guard, one of the bigger-name films at the festival thanks to the presence of Brendan Gleeson and Don Cheadle in the cast. They were also in the theatre and gave a really good Q&A with writer/director John Michael McDonagh after the film. But the film! Right, the film. It was pretty great, one of the wittiest scripts of the year, and an outstanding central performance from Gleeson. Cheadle is good, too, but he’s not given quite as much to do. Gleeson is an outspoken and politically incorrect police guard in Galway, Ireland; his apathetic approach to his job is tested when a murder case he’s investigating turns out to be related to an international drug trafficking case FBI agent Cheadle is working on. Starting off their relationship with “I thought only black boys were drug dealers” doesn’t bode well, but Gleeson’s character is far more nuanced than you’d think. Plus, the film is equal opportunity in its bigotry, insulting English, Welsh, Italians, Dubliners, African-Americans and regular Americans almost in the same breath, and hilariously. And Mark Strong plays one of the villains, and is absolutely fantastic every second he’s on-screen. It’s a really funny movie, with a surprising streak of depth.

My last stop of the night was for one of the Shorts programs. After really enjoying a shorts program at AFI Fest last year, I’m going to try to get to at least one every festival, because these are some really great films, and festivals are just about the only place to see them. What I love about shorts programs is you don’t have any idea what you’re going to get (you can read descriptions, but they’re usually cursory and it can be difficult to find out more), and what you get is incredibly varied. We saw seven shorts, from 5 minute comedies to 16 minute dramas, from stop-motion animation to documentaries, most from the US, but also from Iran, Sweden, and Britain. My favorites among the set were an animated short from the UK called The Eagleman Stag, a unique-looking (everything is totally white) odyssey through the philosophy of time, an Iranian drama of a woman who accidentally locks herself outside without her scarf called The Wind is Blowing on My Street and Sleep Study, a brief comedy about a woman doing all kinds of crazy activities while sleeping. The most talked-about one, though, was easily The Elect, a fly-on-the-wall documentary about one of the leading families in the Westboro Baptist Church – and yes, it was really disturbing for a lot of reasons. It was a really diverse program and a good one, making me wish I’d made it to more of them. Maybe next year. Shorts are great, and ought to get more attention – they’re hyper-focused stories with no time for dross or padding, and allow a great opportunity for experimentation. I just wish there were more opportunities to see them in theaters outside of festivals.

Six days down, four to go. Fourteen films down, eleven to go. Not counting shorts in that number.

Three Reasons: The Night of the Hunter

Aha! A Criterion Three Reasons video for a film I don’t have to lust after – because I already bought it. And you should to. The Night of the Hunter is one of the most oddball and incredible films ever made, somewhere in between film noir, Southern gothic, fantasy, surrealism, and parable. It’s the only film that actor Charles Laughton ever directed, partially because it was not well-received at the time. But looking back, it’s hard to see what he could’ve done to top this, so perhaps it’s fitting that it stands as his only film as director – as unique in his filmography as it is in cinema history.

Page 61 of 101

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén